Apparently, Mayor Christopher Louras objects to having his grand downtown parking plan referred to as his grand downtown parking plan. At least, that seemed to be the gist of a note I found taped to my computer screen yesterday after having called in sick Monday.
It is definitely a plan. It is definitely about parking downtown. Grand, I will admit, is subjective but I think I'm entitled to a little artistic license in the weekly column. The mayor's objection, according to the note, is that the plan that is being assembled under his direction and that he will present (and presumably advocate) to the Board of Aldermen is not his "in a vacuum," but will have to fulfill requirements laid out by the Legislature in Act 40.
Fair enough. I suppose it's good that I didn't go with my original name for it, "The Mayor Louras Parking Plan Written Entirely by Mayor Louras and Nobody Else."
Meanwhile, Alderman Ed Larson has offered his own (for now) plan on changing downtown parking, which he has circulated in an email:
Following the tack of the City of Saratoga Springs, New York; Rutland should eliminate the parking meters downtown entirely, substituting a different system for tagging vehicles who park in violation of our ordinances. Based on projections I have obtained from the City Treasurers Office, the parking meter fund is not currently self sufficient, and by a structured change this could be turned around to a first year balance in the positive of $50,000.00+. Based on increased fines for violations and hiring two part time workers. One of the concerns that seems repetitive from merchants is the all day parkers at the meter spaces who simply feed the meters.
The City would eliminate the meters entirely; which would be an aesthetic improvement downtown. Thus eliminating the costs of meter replacement, maintenance, batteries, poles, etc. Also eliminating the cost of two full time police officers from the P.M.F. fund. The change would be to hire two part time employees (under the auspices of the Treasurers Office) at perhaps $15.00 per hour, no more than thirty (30) hours per week each. The two police officers assigned to the beat would now have responsibilities for downtown safety issues and calls, and be available to "patrol" the Transit Center if we accept it; providing workers and shoppers with a better sense of security. The police officers pay would be relegated back to the Police Department budget. Additionally, the Treasurers Office would no longer have to deal with coinage and the associated costs incurred through the Loomis System. The City could sell the meters, collection carts, etc. and return the revenues to either the General Fund or Parking Fund. Rename the Parking Meter Fund; Parking Fund.
The City could maintain monthly parking passes for street parking in the zones on Court Street, etc. where eight hour meters currently are in place. Anyone with a pass could park for the entire day, while those without would be limited also to two hour parking. The civilian part time employees would simply chalk tires and monitor vehicle movement, issuing tickets in violation of the two hour limitations. If a vehicle is found to be on the boot list, then police could be summoned to attach the boot.
I fully recognize the pros and cons to such a system; however I believe that this could be an incentive to move parkers into the Transit Center, who monopolize meters downtown for most of the day. Coupled with enforcement of the Amtrak Lot, etc. this would benefit shoppers and visitors who find difficulty locating metered spaces, particularly on busy days of the week.
He goes on to provide a spreadsheet (that I'm not even going to try to reformat to fit in here) that seems to back up his $50,000 claim.