U.S. Rep. Peter Welch was in Montpelier Thursday to talk about tax breaks for the middle class.
So what did I ask him about? Iraq, of course!
(To be fair, Welch raised the issue first when he spoke about congressional priorities of Republicans and Democrats).
Welch - who is under fire from anti-war activists in Vermont - pointed out that the U.S. House this month passed a bill that funds withdrawal from Iraq. But that effort was blocked by Republicans in the Senate with the threat of a filibuster, he said, where Democrats have a much slimmer majority.
"There is no funding for Iraq," Welch said. "It won't be next year until we take it up again."
When asked about the Bush administration's long-term agreement with the Iraqi government announced earlier this week, Welch said he is completely opposed to establishing U.S. bases in the country. He added that there is legislation that will be considered to stop that effort.
"One of the reasons people are so upset with the United States is because they think we're in Iraq for the oil and to establish permanent bases," Welch said. "The president needs to stand by his promise not to establish bases there because this is inconsistent with what he has said."
-Dan Barlow