The House’s version of the miscellaneous tax bill – up for a final vote later today – has seen some significant revisions recently. And while the $24 million in new revenues it contains have stolen the spotlight, other interesting provisions have been either added to or scrapped from the legislation.
Lawmakers appeared poised yesterday to reward the fiscal restraint of the 17 supervisory unions who met their Challenges for Change spending targets. The provision would have reduced by one penny the statewide property-tax rates for residents in 61 towns that approved 2-percent decreases in local school spending in March.
The token of gratitude, as some lawmakers called it, generated cheers from the representatives of benefiting municipalities. But the provision would have cost the education fund about $1 million in foregone revenue, and other legislators soon chimed in with concerns.
Some towns, opponents of the rate reduction said, achieved the spending cuts at their local elementary schools. But because the supervisory unions of which they are a part failed to meet the goal overall, they would unfairly be denied the tax relief.
The House Committee on Ways and Means took note, and offered an amendment to yank from the bill a provision it had approved in a committee vote just three days prior.
“This action remains the only incentive that would have recognized our school district for meeting the Legislature’s voluntary request for meeting Challenges for Change goal,” House Minority Leader Don Turner said.
The bill also sets in statute the statewide property tax rate, which will see the first increase since the passage of Act 68 in 2003. Last year’s rate of 86 cents per $100 of assessed property value will rise to 87 cents this year.
Absent from the tax bill is a major overhaul in the state’s income-tax code. The ways and means committee had, until last week, planned to institute a provision that would have lowered income-tax rates by about a third by broadening the base of income on which those rates apply.
The shift from “taxable income” to “adjusted gross income,” proponents said, would eliminate a menu of deductions – like home mortgage loans, charitable contributions and interest payments on school loans – and increase the tax base from $10 billion to $15 billion overnight. The proposal also condensed five income brackets into three.
Vermont is one of only nine states that bases income-tax rates on taxable income. Though the proposal would raise the same amount of revenue, Democratic lawmakers said it would make the state’s income-tax rates more competitive with neighboring states. Vermont has a top rate of about 9 percent. Massachusetts’ is 5 percent.
Committee members though pulled the provision from the bill. The proposal could still make it to the floor this year in a piece of standalone legislation. Lawmakers say they need to work out kinks in the new code before moving ahead.
House Speaker Shap Smith and Ways-and-Means Chairwoman Janet Ancel have suggested the tax-code overhaul bill, if it materializes, could be used as a vehicle for a proposed surcharge on the incomes of the wealthy.
The surcharge, sought by Progressives and some Democrats in a floor amendment Tuesday, failed to win support. Smith though said he might reconsider his opposition if the federal government approves a budget that results in additional cuts to Vermont programs.
Self-employed Vermonters will see some relief in the tax bill. Currently they’re unable to deduct health-insurance costs from their income-tax forms. Lawmakers say it creates an unfair disadvantage, since the health benefits of employed residents are decoupled from their taxable income.
The measure is expected to cost the state about $700,000 in foregone revenue in fiscal year 2013.
Wood-products manufacturers will see a two-year extension of a tax credit, a move expected to save that industry about $400,000 in tax liabilities in fiscal year 2013.
The tax bill would repeal a provision in the tax code that reduces property-transfer tax rates on land that is part of the Current Use program. The change would generate $170,000 next year, which would be allocated to the tax department to digitize land records.
The bill also spares some organizations from a law that imposed sales taxes on admission tickets sold by nonprofits. The new threshold is designed to insulate smaller organizations from the tax and would cost the state about $75,000 in foregone revenue next year.