While many of Vermont's journalists were in Grafton for a conference on government transparency last Friday, Gov. Shumlin held a press conference on a new effort to increase transparency in Vermont's government. There were very promising signs in what the governor said, but in general we have a 'wait-and-see' attitude.
The issues with transparency seem to boil down to a few things: the state employee time it takes to process public records requests; what is or isn't exempted from Vermont's public records law; and who pays the legal bills when a dispute over what is public and what is not goes to court.
Meanwhile, S.16, introduced by Sens. Dick Sears (D-Bennington) and Joe Benning (R-Caledonia), proposes to add another exception to the public record law, by making any adult case accepted by a diversion program confidential.The way this bill is written, it looks as if the arrest would still be public information, but anything related to how the police came to arrest a given person would be private.
And H.22, introduced by 22 House members, would, upon petition, expunge all records related to misdemeanor crimes after five years, upon petition. This might apply for people who are caught with a joint in their pocket, or other minor crimes, but anyone convicted of a serious felony would not be able to petition for expungement.